Editor’s note –
March 2026

Fact-checkers are Big Pharma’s unpaid sales team – but they’re doing us some good as well

There’s good news and bad news.

New research confirms what we’ve suspected for years: the way mainstream media and medical authorities debunk “misinformation” actually makes people believe it MORE.

That’s good news when it comes to ridiculous scare stories about supplements being basically useless for anything – we’ve seen that with vitamin C, vitamin D, probiotics and antioxidants to name just a few.

The often-misleading Cochrane organisation has, for instance, pretty much suggested that taking antioxidant supplements can kill you. And its 2021 systematic review decided that “current evidence does not support the use of antioxidant supplements in the general population or in patients with various diseases”.

The bad news is that Big Pharma uses this brain aberration as a marketing tool.

This has all just been brought to light by researchers at Tianjin Normal University in a paper due to be published in next month’s Acta Psychologica. They tested 180 people and found something extraordinary.

When fact-checkers repeat scary disease warnings while debunking cures, they strengthen belief in the ”fake” remedy. The correction becomes an advertisement for the lie.

Here’s the mechanism. Your brain sees: “Disease X causes terrifying symptoms, but Remedy Y doesn’t work”. It doesn’t register the “doesn’t work” part. It reinforces the pairing: scary problem → easy solution. The fear sticks. The solution sticks with it.

Fear-based corrections inflate confidence in “fake” treatments without making people feel more threatened by the disease. This explains everything about Big Pharma marketing. Pair a frightening condition with a pill, and even when the science is shaky, the emotional architecture is already built. The semaglutide hype. The statin religion. The “age-related decline” narrative that conveniently requires lifelong medication.

It also explains why our evidence-based interventions are so resilient. Every time a fact-checker says, “Alzheimer’s is devastating BUT the Bredesen protocol won’t prevent it”, they’re accidentally cementing the Bredesen-Alzheimer’s link in people’s minds.

The Chinese researchers say corrections should focus on WHY the remedy doesn’t work – not on rehearsing the scary symptoms. Stop repeating the fear. Dismantle the mechanism.

So, the real question is, do mainstream health communicators want to break this cycle? After all, fear is a powerful sales tool for drugs, supplements, and even news. The correction industry might be the best marketing Big Pharma never had to pay for.

For practitioners, this study is nothing but good news. Let “them” keep debunking what we do. Every scare-laden “correction” just reinforces what we know and our clients already sense – that there’s a better way. No worries!

…